This content was paid for by White & Case and produced in partnership with the Financial Times Commercial department
Financing the energy transition
Financing the energy transition
The cost of moving the energy sector towards net zero is huge, but new research reveals that companies are increasingly prepared to invest – and funding is increasingly available

For years, climate change campaigners and policymakers have argued that leading energy companies must play a key role in decarbonisation if the world is to move towards net zero. Now, research suggests the industry is prepared to rise to the challenge.

The proportion of energy companies that regard capital investment in energy transition as a top priority has tripled over the past two years, according to a study by law firm White & Case. Today, 42 per cent of energy businesses take this view, up from 14 per cent from 2021.

Where are energy companies allocating capital?
42%14%
Capital investment in energy transition initiatives
28%11%
Returns to investors / shareholders
20%32%
Capital investment in traditional business

The shift reflects a growing realisation that simply investing more in greener energy while maintaining traditional production will not be enough to accelerate global decarbonisation at sufficient pace, argues Sandra Rafferty, a partner at White & Case. “Initially, when corporates, funds and banks considered energy transition, it was with a view to identifying and funding renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, as well as newer technologies,” she says. “The more forward-thinking players in the sector now recognise that full energy transition will also encompass taking fossil-based systems of energy production and consumption and decarbonising them.”

The scale of the challenge

Even with this shift, the figures remain daunting. The International Energy Association believes that, in order to reach net zero by 2050, clean energy investment worldwide will need to more than triple in this decade to US$4tn. Progress is being made - the first half of 2022 saw an 11 per cent increase, year-on-year, in investment in renewable energy, to US$226bn - but there is some way to go.

The good news is the energy sector expects to be able to tap into a range of funding sources to bridge the gap. For example, private equity investors are growing enthused by the opportunity, with 40 per cent of energy companies in White & Case’s research study expecting to access PE funding over the next 18 months. “The investment community has really made climate action the new business imperative,” says Annette Clayton, CEO of Schneider Electric North America. “It’s a business opportunity because less carbon is less cost; it’s a time for organisations to reimagine themselves, their solutions and their stakeholders.”

How will energy companies finance their energy transition initiatives?
Private equity
40%
Existing balance sheet
32%
Equity capital markets
29%
Debt capital markets
20%
Bank loans
19%
Export credit agency
40%
In the next 18 months, which of the following options do you expect to pursue to finance your energy transition initiatives

It’s not only cash that these investors provide. A growing number of deals in the sector have seen energy companies team up with financial sponsors that have expertise in major infrastructure projects. These joint venture partners bring funding, certainly, but also the experience of funding and managing large-scale projects. “Bringing capital into this sector is enormously important, but there is also a skill in being able to create assets,” says David Tilstone, a Managing Director at Macquarie Asset Management. “It requires expertise and experience to be able to go through that development period and to commercialise a project.”

Such initiatives are also enabling the sector to explore new business models, adds Clayton, who points to two Schneider Electric joint ventures to create energy-as-a-service solutions: AlphaStruxure with The Carlyle Group, and GreenStruxure with Huck Capital and ClearGen. “This is an absolutely new way of serving the market,” she says. “The energy-as-a-service business model eliminates all the upfront customer cost for the project, as well as giving them long-term cost predictability for energy supply and insulating the customer from rising energy costs.”

Investment appeal

For investors, the decarbonisation story looks increasingly attractive. In 2021, private equity investors allocated US$21.5bn to the US renewable energy sector; last year, a single infrastructure fund, Brookfield Asset Management, raised US$15bn for its Global Transition Fund.

Energy companies are not only looking outwards for funding, however; 32 per cent say they will turn to their existing balance sheets to finance energy transition initiatives, particularly following a period in which soaring energy prices have generated outsized revenues. Many also point to plans to raise new funding from the debt or equity markets.

Which financial instruments do capital providers expect to use for energy transition initiatives?
Private equity
45%
Project finance
36%
Corporate green bonds
35%
Acquisition finance
20%
Mezzanine finance
15%
Sovereign green bonds
13%
Which financial instruments and providers of finance do you envision using for energy transition initiatives in the next 18 months?

It helps that the sector expects to be able to raise finance through a variety of different sources and mechanisms. Alongside sources such as project finance and acquisition funding, the rapid growth of the green bond market offers an increasingly rich vein for energy companies to tap into. Green bond issuance exceeded $500bn for the first time in 2021, when fundraising increased by 73 per cent compared with 2020. According to White & Case’s research, 35 per cent of capital finance providers said they intended to make use of corporate green bonds.

The evolution of such funding will reassure governments, which are under pressure to offer more support – directly or indirectly – to energy companies seeking to decarbonise. The implications for public finances, as well as the political debate, make this challenging.

Energy companies that do push for such support should expect it to come with strings attached, warns White & Case’s Sandra Rafferty. “Governments need to ensure that any such support is proportionate and does not result in super profits for the recipients, particularly at the expense of the consumer,” she says. “To ensure this, it is likely that there will be greater scrutiny and regulation in the energy sector, not dissimilar to what happened to the financial services sector following the global financial crisis.”